People v. Karris

133 A.D.3d 780, 19 N.Y.S.3d 190
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 18, 2015·No. 2013-00504·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weber, J.), rendered December 14, 2012, convicting him of assault in the second degree as a hate crime, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction of assault in the second degree as a hate crime. Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348 [2007]; People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

*781 The defendant’s remaining contentions, raised in his pro se supplemental brief, are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit. Hall, J.P., Sgroi, Cohen and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Karris, 133 A.D.3d 780, 19 N.Y.S.3d 190 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

133 A.D.3d 780 (People v. Karris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)
People v. Romero
859 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)