People v. Kane

100 A.D.2d 944, 474 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18078
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 23, 1984·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Lamont, J.), imposed July 15, 1982, upon his conviction of burglary in the third degree, insofar as it denied his application for youthful offender treatment. 11 Sentence affirmed, insofar as appealed from. H Since defendant had been previously adjudicated a youthful offender following his conviction of a felony, he was ineligible for youthful offender treatment following his subsequent conviction of the instant crime of burglary in the third degree (see CPL 720.10, subd 2, par [c]; People v Green, 75 AD2d 625). In any event, even if defendant was eligible, his record and background would support the denial of youthful offender treatment. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Kane, 100 A.D.2d 944, 474 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18078 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

100 A.D.2d 944 (People v. Kane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Storts
110 A.D.3d 930 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Green
154 A.D.2d 711 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Robinson
145 A.D.2d 949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Sanchez
128 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)