People v. Kane

235 A.D. 738

This text of 235 A.D. 738 (People v. Kane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Kane, 235 A.D. 738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Order of the County Court of Kings county denying defendant’s motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence reversed on the law and the facts, verdict set aside, judgment vacated and a new trial ordered. The conviction herein rests almost entirely upon the testimony of Solomon Schweitzer. That testimony is of a somewhat unstable character and not free from elements of contradiction. His credibility, therefore, was of prime importance. The newly-discovered evidence bears upon his credibility, and a jury passing upon the charge made against this defendant should have the benefit of that newly-discovered evidence in order that it may be better able to pass upon the credibility of Solomon Schweitzer. Accordingly, the discovery of this new evidence and the interests of justice require that the motion be granted and a new trial be had. In view of this decision the appeal from the judgment of conviction is dismissed as unnecessary. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Seudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kane-nyappdiv-1932.