People v. Kandekore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Kandekore

256 A.D.2d 590, 682 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13978

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 28, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 256 A.D.2d 590 (People v. Kandekore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Kandekore, 256 A.D.2d 590, 682 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13978 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), rendered April 28, 1995, convicting him of assault in the second degree, resisting arrest, and driving while ability impaired, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Copertino, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), rendered April 28, 1995, convicting him of assault in the second degree, resisting arrest, and driving while ability impaired, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Copertino, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D.2d 590, 682 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kandekore-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack