People v. Kahn
This text of 281 A.D. 982 (People v. Kahn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion, in the nature of a writ of error, coram nobis, to vacate a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, convicting him of practicing medicine without a license. Order affirmed. Appellant was convicted after a trial, and the alleged error of which he now complains appeared on the face of the record, which was reviewed by this court on appeal from the judgment of conviction. (People v. Kahn, 266 App. Div. 787.) Under such circumstances, coram nobis is not available. (People V. Sadness, 300 N. Y. 69.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Wenzel, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.D. 982, 120 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kahn-nyappdiv-1953.