People v. Kahley

60 A.D.3d 1438, 874 N.Y.S.2d 852
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 20, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 60 A.D.3d 1438 (People v. Kahley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Kahley, 60 A.D.3d 1438, 874 N.Y.S.2d 852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Motion for writ of error coram nobis granted. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel failed to raise an issue on direct appeal that would have resulted in reversal, specifically, whether the court complied with the statutory mandates of CPL 310.30. Upon our review of the trial court proceedings, we conclude that the issue may have merit. Therefore, the order of May 31, 1996 is vacated and this Court will consider the appeal de novo (see People v LeFrois, 151 AD2d 1046 [1989]). Defendant is directed to file and serve his records and briefs with this Court on or before July 17, 2009. Present — Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Peradotto, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

KAHLEY, DALE, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
People v. Kahley
105 A.D.3d 1322 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 A.D.3d 1438, 874 N.Y.S.2d 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kahley-nyappdiv-2009.