People v. Kahan
This text of 206 N.E.2d 333 (People v. Kahan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The decision in People v. Bookcase, Inc. (14 N Y 2d 409) implied that a constitutionally valid statute defining obscenity in its impact on the young, as distinguished from obscenity in respect of adults, might emerge under careful [312]*312draftsmanship. We find defects in draftsmanship of section 484--b of the Penal Law which seem to be remediable both in respect of its -substantive definitions and in respect of scienter as to contents and the age of the customer. (Cf. Smith v. California, 361 U. S. 147.)
The orders should be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
206 N.E.2d 333, 15 N.Y.2d 311, 258 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kahan-ny-1965.