People v. Kacalski
177 A.D.2d 1025, 579 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15812
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1991·Published
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428), we find that the record discloses that there is legally sufficient evidence for the jury to have found that the victim sustained "physical injury” within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00 (9) (see, People v Bogan, 70 NY2d 860, rearg denied 70 NY2d 951). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Drury, J.— Assault, 3rd Degree.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Kacalski, 177 A.D.2d 1025, 579 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15812 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).
177 A.D.2d 1025 (People v. Kacalski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Greene
517 N.E.2d 1344 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Ford
488 N.E.2d 458 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)