People v. Kabba

2017 NY Slip Op 4692
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 9, 2017
Docket750 KA 14-00922
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 4692 (People v. Kabba) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Kabba, 2017 NY Slip Op 4692 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

People v Kabba (2017 NY Slip Op 04692)
People v Kabba
2017 NY Slip Op 04692
Decided on June 9, 2017
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 9, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.

750 KA 14-00922

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

ALHASSAN KABBA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (KIMBERLY F. DUGUAY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LEAH R. MERVINE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Vincent M. Dinolfo, J.), rendered April 4, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of rape in the second degree (Penal Law

§ 130.30 [1]). We agree with defendant that the waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass his challenge to the severity of the sentence. "[N]o mention was made on the record during the course of the allocution concerning the waiver of defendant's right to appeal his conviction that he was also waiving his right to appeal the [severity] of his sentence" (People v Pimentel, 108 AD3d 861, 862, lv denied 21 NY3d 1076; see People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 928). Moreover, the written waiver of the right to appeal signed by defendant does not state that defendant was waiving his right to appeal his sentence. We nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: June 9, 2017

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Maracle
973 N.E.2d 1272 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)
People v. Pimentel
108 A.D.3d 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 4692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kabba-nyappdiv-2017.