People v. Justiniano

216 A.D.2d 953, 629 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7342
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 9, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 216 A.D.2d 953 (People v. Justiniano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Justiniano, 216 A.D.2d 953, 629 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7342 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), we conclude that the evidence of constructive possession of the cocaine is legally sufficient (see, People v Torres, 68 NY2d 677; People v Myrick, 203 AD2d 902). We further conclude that defendant’s sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Doyle, J.—Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Patterson
13 A.D.3d 1138 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 A.D.2d 953, 629 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-justiniano-nyappdiv-1995.