People v. June
This text of 242 A.D.2d 977 (People v. June) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for an extension of time to take appeal granted. Memorandum: The fact that a defendant waives his right to appeal as part of a negotiated plea agreement “does not foreclose appellate review in all situations” and is not “sufficient to divest the court of subject matter jurisdiction” (People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 284). The failure to notify a defendant in writing pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.11 (a), even when the right to appeal has been waived, constitutes improper conduct (see, CPL 460.30 [1] [a]). Present—Green, J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Balio and Fallon, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D.2d 977, 668 N.Y.S.2d 961, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-june-nyappdiv-1997.