People v. June

242 A.D.2d 977, 668 N.Y.S.2d 961, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10654
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 1997·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Motion for an extension of time to take appeal granted. Memorandum: The fact that a defendant waives his right to appeal as part of a negotiated plea agreement “does not foreclose appellate review in all situations” and is not “sufficient to divest the court of subject matter jurisdiction” (People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 284). The failure to notify a defendant in writing pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.11 (a), even when the right to appeal has been waived, constitutes improper conduct (see, CPL 460.30 [1] [a]). Present—Green, J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Balio and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. June, 242 A.D.2d 977, 668 N.Y.S.2d 961, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10654 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

242 A.D.2d 977 (People v. June) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

FINSTER, FRANCIS, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
People v. Finster
136 A.D.3d 1279 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)