People v. Junco
This text of 325 N.E.2d 879 (People v. Junco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant argued that the decision that New York had legal jurisdiction over his person was a violation of the full faith and credit clause of 'article IV, and of the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals considered this contention and found that there was no violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights. [See 35 N Y 2d 419.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
325 N.E.2d 879, 36 N.Y.2d 712, 366 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 1739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-junco-ny-1975.