People v. Junco

325 N.E.2d 879, 36 N.Y.2d 712, 366 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 1739
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 27, 1975·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant argued that the decision that New York had legal jurisdiction over his person was a violation of the full faith and credit clause of 'article IV, and of the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals considered this contention and found that there was no violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights. [See 35 N Y 2d 419.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Junco, 325 N.E.2d 879, 36 N.Y.2d 712, 366 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 1739 (N.Y. 1975).

325 N.E.2d 879 (People v. Junco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Caviano
148 Misc. 2d 426 (New York Supreme Court, 1990)
People v. Allen
146 Misc. 2d 701 (New York County Courts, 1990)