People v. Junco

325 N.E.2d 879, 36 N.Y.2d 712, 366 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 1739
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 27, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 325 N.E.2d 879 (People v. Junco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Junco, 325 N.E.2d 879, 36 N.Y.2d 712, 366 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 1739 (N.Y. 1975).

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant argued that the decision that New York had legal jurisdiction over his person was a violation of the full faith and credit clause of 'article IV, and of the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals considered this contention and found that there was no violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights. [See 35 N Y 2d 419.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Caviano
148 Misc. 2d 426 (New York Supreme Court, 1990)
People v. Allen
146 Misc. 2d 701 (New York County Courts, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
325 N.E.2d 879, 36 N.Y.2d 712, 366 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 1739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-junco-ny-1975.