People v. Julian
372 N.E.2d 572, 43 N.Y.2d 733, 401 N.Y.S.2d 785, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2532
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order affirmed. Defendant’s use of his sock to hold a small package did not alone provide the two police officers with cause to stop and summon him to a police car, position him between them, and inquire about the package. Defendant’s conduct, even in a high crime area, might just as well have been to secrete noncontraband valuables.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Julian, 372 N.E.2d 572, 43 N.Y.2d 733, 401 N.Y.S.2d 785, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2532 (N.Y. 1977).
372 N.E.2d 572 (People v. Julian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Williams
79 A.D.2d 147 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
People v. Sobotker
373 N.E.2d 1218 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)