People v. Juhl

38 A.D.2d 889, 329 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5256

This text of 38 A.D.2d 889 (People v. Juhl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Juhl, 38 A.D.2d 889, 329 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5256 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Motion granted, judgment vacated and new trial granted. Memorandum: Since no appeal was taken by the District Attorney from the order granting defendant’s application to be resenteneed, we are not empowered to review the propriety of that order, and as a consequence, we are now constrained to grant defendant’s motion. The destruction of the trial transcript and stenographic notes forecloses the defendant from having an appellate review of any of the evidence and rulings of the trial court. (People v. Jackson, 36 A D 2d 1008; People v. Schwach, 16 A D 2d 879; People v. Lomoso, 284 App. Div. 670.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lomoso
284 A.D. 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 A.D.2d 889, 329 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-juhl-nyappdiv-1972.