People v. Judges of Yates Common Pleas
This text of 1 Wend. 90 (People v. Judges of Yates Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On appeal. fenL°ntsW<may appeal; and a bond, descnbing him asimtheadother"defendant, is cor-
Motion for a mandamus. The relator applied to the common P^eas to quash an appeal, because made by one of two defendants, against whom judgment was rendered, and be- , , , , . , , . , ’ cause the appeal bond was executed by him alone, describing him as impleaded with the other defendant, instead of being executed by both defendants; which motion was denied. And this court now refused to grant a mandamus, saying the common pleas had decided correctly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Wend. 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-judges-of-yates-common-pleas-nysupct-1828.