People v. Judges of Yates Common Pleas

1 Wend. 90
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1828·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

On appeal. fenL°ntsW<may appeal; and a bond, descnbing him asimtheadother"defendant, is cor-

Motion for a mandamus. The relator applied to the common P^eas to quash an appeal, because made by one of two defendants, against whom judgment was rendered, and be- , , , , . , , . , ’ cause the appeal bond was executed by him alone, describing him as impleaded with the other defendant, instead of being executed by both defendants; which motion was denied. And this court now refused to grant a mandamus, saying the common pleas had decided correctly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Judges of Yates Common Pleas, 1 Wend. 90 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).

1 Wend. 90 (People v. Judges of Yates Common Pleas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Savings and Loan Society v. Thompson
32 Cal. 347 (California Supreme Court, 1867)
Soule v. Chase
1 Abb. Pr. 48 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1863)
Shaw & Morehouse v. Moser
3 Mich. 71 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1853)
Sheldon v. . Wright
5 N.Y. 497 (New York Court of Appeals, 1851)