People v. Judges of Chautauque Common Pleas

1 Wend. 73
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1828·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Woodworth, J.

In accordance with the-liberal principle of amendments which has latterly obtained, and by which the ends of justice are so greatly promoted, the court feel not-disposed to interfere with the exercise of discretion by the common pleas in this case. They do not perceive that the amendment violates- any rule of law; and unless it had been allowed, it is doubtful whether- the plaintiff in the suit below would not have been remediless. The motion for a mandamus is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Judges of Chautauque Common Pleas, 1 Wend. 73 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).

1 Wend. 73 (People v. Judges of Chautauque Common Pleas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richardson v. Farrar
15 S.E. 117 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1892)
Bank of Sheboygan v. Trilling
43 N.W. 830 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1889)