People v. Judges of Chautauque Common Pleas
1 Wend. 73
Opinion
By the Court,
In accordance with the-liberal principle of amendments which has latterly obtained, and by which the ends of justice are so greatly promoted, the court feel not-disposed to interfere with the exercise of discretion by the common pleas in this case. They do not perceive that the amendment violates- any rule of law; and unless it had been allowed, it is doubtful whether- the plaintiff in the suit below would not have been remediless. The motion for a mandamus is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Judges of Chautauque Common Pleas, 1 Wend. 73 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).
1 Wend. 73 (People v. Judges of Chautauque Common Pleas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Richardson v. Farrar
15 S.E. 117 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1892)
Bank of Sheboygan v. Trilling
43 N.W. 830 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1889)