People v. Judges of Chautauque Common Pleas

New York Supreme Court

People v. Judges of Chautauque Common Pleas

1 Wend. 73

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 15, 1828

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Wend. 73 (People v. Judges of Chautauque Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Judges of Chautauque Common Pleas, 1 Wend. 73 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Woodworth, J.

In accordance with the-liberal principle of amendments which has latterly obtained, and by which the ends of justice are so greatly promoted, the court feel not-disposed to interfere with the exercise of discretion by the common pleas in this case. They do not perceive that the amendment violates- any rule of law; and unless it had been allowed, it is doubtful whether- the plaintiff in the suit below would not have been remediless. The motion for a mandamus is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Woodworth, J.

In accordance with the-liberal principle of amendments which has latterly obtained, and by which the ends of justice are so greatly promoted, the court feel not-disposed to interfere with the exercise of discretion by the common pleas in this case. They do not perceive that the amendment violates- any rule of law; and unless it had been allowed, it is doubtful whether- the plaintiff in the suit below would not have been remediless. The motion for a mandamus is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Wend. 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-judges-of-chautauque-common-pleas-nysupct-1828.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack