People v. Juarbe
This text of 36 A.D.3d 602 (People v. Juarbe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated January 21, 2005, which, after a hearing to redetermine the defendant’s sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court’s determination to designate the defendant a level three sex offender based upon the existence of a “presumptive override” factor, namely, that the defendant had “a prior felony conviction for a sex crime” is supported by clear and convincing evidence and thus, should not be disturbed (see People v Page, 32 AD3d 1352 [2006]; People v Clinkscales, 18 AD3d 726 [2005]; People v Boan, 11 AD3d 956 [2004]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review. Miller, J.P, Rivera, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 A.D.3d 602, 825 N.Y.S.2d 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-juarbe-nyappdiv-2007.