People v. Jovine

186 N.Y.S.3d 388, 215 A.D.3d 883, 2023 NY Slip Op 02018
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 19, 2023
Docket2019-03624
StatusPublished

This text of 186 N.Y.S.3d 388 (People v. Jovine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Jovine, 186 N.Y.S.3d 388, 215 A.D.3d 883, 2023 NY Slip Op 02018 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Jovine (2023 NY Slip Op 02018)
People v Jovine
2023 NY Slip Op 02018
Decided on April 19, 2023
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 19, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P.
LARA J. GENOVESI
WILLIAM G. FORD
LILLIAN WAN, JJ.

2019-03624
2019-12378

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Luilly Jovine, appellant. (Ind. Nos. 631/16, 1468/16)


Valerie A. Livingston, White Plains, NY, for appellant.

Miriam E. Rocah, District Attorney, White Plains, NY (Raffaelina Gianfrancesco of counsel), for respondent (no brief filed).



DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Anne E. Minihan, J.), both rendered February 5, 2019, convicting him of grand larceny in third degree under Indictment No. 631/16, and burglary in the second degree (two counts) and assault in the second degree under Indictment No. 1468/16, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., GENOVESI, FORD and WAN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re Giovanni S.
89 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 N.Y.S.3d 388, 215 A.D.3d 883, 2023 NY Slip Op 02018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jovine-nyappdiv-2023.