People v. Jovanovic

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Jovanovic

735 N.E.2d 1284, 95 N.Y.2d 846, 713 N.Y.S.2d 519, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 1816

DecidedJuly 6, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 735 N.E.2d 1284 (People v. Jovanovic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jovanovic, 735 N.E.2d 1284, 95 N.Y.2d 846, 713 N.Y.S.2d 519, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 1816 (N.Y. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal granted and appeal dismissed upon the ground that the reversal at the Appellate Division was not “on the law alone or upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal” (CPL 450.90 [2] [a]). Although the order states that the reversal is on the law, the opinion reveals that an independent ground for reversal was the applicability of the CPL 60.42 (5) “interests of justice” exception to the Rape Shield Law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dismiss appeal granted and appeal dismissed upon the ground that the reversal at the Appellate Division was not “on the law alone or upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal” (CPL 450.90 [2] [a]). Although the order states that the reversal is on the law, the opinion reveals that an independent ground for reversal was the applicability of the CPL 60.42 (5) “interests of justice” exception to the Rape Shield Law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

735 N.E.2d 1284, 95 N.Y.2d 846, 713 N.Y.S.2d 519, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 1816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jovanovic-ny-2000.