People v. Joshua

224 A.D.2d 284, 638 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1103

This text of 224 A.D.2d 284 (People v. Joshua) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Joshua, 224 A.D.2d 284, 638 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1103 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Clifford Scott, J.), rendered November 25, 1992, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Given the existence of overwhelming evidence that defendant sold drugs to an undercover officer in exchange for prerecorded buy money, the cumulative effect of any errors committed by the trial court and prosecutor was harmless and does not warrant reversal (People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230).

Defendant’s claims concerning his impeachment as a witness are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review them, we would find them to be without merit. The disclosure of defendant’s misdemeanor conviction for possession of a weapon, previously excluded at the Sandoval hearing, was volunteered by defendant when the court questioned him concerning an alleged larceny conviction of the same date. Defendant must bear responsibility for this disclosure, caused by defendant’s own reluctance to admit his prior criminal convictions and his failure to advise the court at the Sandoval hearing that the alleged larceny conviction was actually "covered” by the plea to the weapon charges.

[285]*285The court’s comments when the defendant testified do not, on this record, warrant reversal.

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 A.D.2d 284, 638 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-joshua-nyappdiv-1996.