People v. Joseph

2 A.D.3d 124, 767 N.Y.S.2d 770, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12693
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Joseph. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 A.D.3d 435

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Efrain Alvarado, J.), rendered September 8, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5V2 to 11 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). Issues of credibility and identification were properly presented to the jury and we find no reason to disturb its determinations.

The challenged portions of the People’s summation did not [125]*125deprive defendant of a fair trial (see People v D’Alessandro, 184 AD2d 114, 118-119 [1992], lv denied 81 NY2d 884 [1993]). To the extent that any of the challenged remarks were inappropriate, the court’s prompt curative actions were sufficient to prevent any prejudice (see People v Santiago, 52 NY2d 865 [1981]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Rosenberger, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Joseph, 2 A.D.3d 124, 767 N.Y.S.2d 770, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12693 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

2 A.D.3d 124 (People v. Joseph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Santiago
418 N.E.2d 668 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. D'Alessandro
184 A.D.2d 114 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)