People v. Jorden

127 A.D.2d 971, 512 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43456

This text of 127 A.D.2d 971 (People v. Jorden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Jorden, 127 A.D.2d 971, 512 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43456 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant argues on appeal that the evidence at trial was insufficient as a matter of law to support his grand larceny and burglary convictions. This argument is without merit. There was evidence in the record, which the jury had the right to accept, to support the verdict (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621). We have examined defendant’s remaining arguments and find them without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J.— burglary, third degree, and grand larceny, third degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 A.D.2d 971, 512 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jorden-nyappdiv-1987.