People v. Jordan

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Jordan. Read the opinion of the Court — 136 A.D.3d 697
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 17, 2016·No. 2015-06243·Published

Opinion

People v Jordan (2016 NY Slip Op 05800)
People v Jordan
2016 NY Slip Op 05800
Decided on August 17, 2016
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on August 17, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
JEFFREY A. COHEN
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2015-06243

[*1]People of State of New York, respondent,

v

Jackie Jordan, appellant.


Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, NY (Angie Louie of counsel), for appellant.

Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, NY (Anne Grady and Alex Fumelli of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated September 23, 2014, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A court determining a defendant's risk level under the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C; hereinafter SORA) is not permitted to downwardly depart from the presumptive risk level unless the defendant first identifies and proves the presence of "a mitigating factor of a kind, or to a degree, that is not otherwise adequately taken into account by the SORA Guidelines" (People v Lathan, 129 AD3d 686, 687 [internal quotation mark omitted]; see SORA: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 4 [2006]). Here, the defendant failed to prove the existence of such a mitigating factor (see People v Lathan, 129 AD3d at 687; People v Ciudadreal, 125 AD3d 950, 950). Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly denied his request for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level (see People v Lathan, 129 AD3d at 687).

BALKIN, J.P., ROMAN, COHEN and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jordan, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

People v. Jordan (People v. Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ciudadreal
125 A.D.3d 950 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Lathan
129 A.D.3d 686 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)