People v. Jordan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Jordan

4 A.D.3d 796, 771 N.Y.S.2d 457, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1373

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 11, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 A.D.3d 796 (People v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jordan, 4 A.D.3d 796, 771 N.Y.S.2d 457, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1373 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (Craig J. Doran, J), rendered November 26, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Contrary to the contention of defendant, his waiver of the right to appeal was effective, even though it was not in writing (see People v Willis, 2 AD3d 1322 [2003]). We conclude that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to appeal, and none of defendant’s remaining contentions survive that waiver. Present—Green, J.E, Wisner, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (Craig J. Doran, J), rendered November 26, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Contrary to the contention of defendant, his waiver of the right to appeal was effective, even though it was not in writing (see People v Willis, 2 AD3d 1322 [2003]). We conclude that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to appeal, and none of defendant’s remaining contentions survive that waiver. Present—Green, J.E, Wisner, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.D.3d 796, 771 N.Y.S.2d 457, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jordan-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack