People v. Jordan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Jordan

277 A.D.2d 1041

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 6, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 1041 (People v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jordan, 277 A.D.2d 1041 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the County Court, Kings [1042]*1042County, convicting him of the crimes of rape in the first degree and assault in the second degree. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial ordered in the interests of justice. The Trial Judge unduly indicated his disbelief of the testimony of defendant and of his witness Adams. Moreover, it was error to rule that the defendant was bound by answers elicited on cross-examination of complainant. Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the County Court, Kings [1042]*1042County, convicting him of the crimes of rape in the first degree and assault in the second degree. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial ordered in the interests of justice. The Trial Judge unduly indicated his disbelief of the testimony of defendant and of his witness Adams. Moreover, it was error to rule that the defendant was bound by answers elicited on cross-examination of complainant. Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 1041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jordan-nyappdiv-1950.