People v. Joon Jun

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Joon Jun

259 A.D.2d 710, 685 N.Y.S.2d 622, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2655

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 22, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D.2d 710 (People v. Joon Jun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Joon Jun, 259 A.D.2d 710, 685 N.Y.S.2d 622, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2655 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), rendered August 4, 1994, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the plea is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings.

The People concede that reversal of the judgment is warranted because the defendant was represented by an attorney who had in fact been disbarred pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a) prior to the time he undertook to represent the defendant. The People’s concession implicitly waived any issues the People may have raised concerning the adequacy of the proof in the present record relating to, inter alia, whether the defendant knew that his former attorney had been disbarred pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a). Also implicit in the People’s concession is an admission that the attorney’s disbarment was based on conduct which bespeaks lack of moral character and [711]*711which thus relates to the attorney’s presumed competence. Under these circumstances, we accept the People’s concession as valid (see generally, People v Kieser, 79 NY2d 936, 938; People v Chin Min Foo, 144 Misc 2d 589, 592; People v Williams, 140 Misc 2d 136; cf., People v Felder, 47 NY2d 287, 294, n 6; see also, Annotation, Representation by Nonattorney, 19 ALR5th 351). S. Miller, J. P., Santucci, Sullivan and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), rendered August 4, 1994, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the plea is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings.

The People concede that reversal of the judgment is warranted because the defendant was represented by an attorney who had in fact been disbarred pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a) prior to the time he undertook to represent the defendant. The People’s concession implicitly waived any issues the People may have raised concerning the adequacy of the proof in the present record relating to, inter alia, whether the defendant knew that his former attorney had been disbarred pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a). Also implicit in the People’s concession is an admission that the attorney’s disbarment was based on conduct which bespeaks lack of moral character and [711]*711which thus relates to the attorney’s presumed competence. Under these circumstances, we accept the People’s concession as valid (see generally, People v Kieser, 79 NY2d 936, 938; People v Chin Min Foo, 144 Misc 2d 589, 592; People v Williams, 140 Misc 2d 136; cf., People v Felder, 47 NY2d 287, 294, n 6; see also, Annotation, Representation by Nonattorney, 19 ALR5th 351). S. Miller, J. P., Santucci, Sullivan and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 710, 685 N.Y.S.2d 622, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-joon-jun-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack