People v. Jones

142 A.D.3d 677, 36 N.Y.S.3d 828
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 24, 2016·No. 2015-09963·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Condon, J.), imposed August 25, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid, as the record fails to establish that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]). Thus, the waiver does not preclude review of the defendant’s excessive *678 sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Chambers, Austin, Roman and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jones, 142 A.D.3d 677, 36 N.Y.S.3d 828 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

142 A.D.3d 677 (People v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Jones
28 N.Y.3d 1073 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)