People v. Jones
105 A.D.3d 869, 961 N.Y.S.2d 805
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 73 A.D.3d 1386 →
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DiMango, J), imposed August 9, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
[870]*870Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]), and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Jones, 105 A.D.3d 869, 961 N.Y.S.2d 805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).
105 A.D.3d 869 (People v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)