People v. Jones

94 A.D.3d 1482, 942 N.Y.S.2d 835
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 63 A.D.3d 1582

Opinion

The case is held, the decision is reserved, the motion to relieve counsel of assignment is granted and new counsel is to be assigned. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order that denied his motion pursuant to CPL 440.30 (1-a) for the performance of forensic DNA testing on specified evidence. Defendant’s assigned appellate counsel has moved to be relieved of the assignment pursuant to People v Crawford (71 AD2d 38 [1979]). However, we find that a nonfrivolous issue exists as to whether the People met their burden of establishing with sufficient specificity whether the evidence existed and could be tested (see People v Pitts, 4 NY3d 303 [2005]). Therefore, we relieve counsel of his assignment and assign new counsel to brief this issue, as well as any other issues that counsel’s review of the record may disclose. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Penny M. Wolfgang, J. — CPL 440.30 [1-a]). Present — Scudder, EJ., Smith, Fahey and Sconiers, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jones, 94 A.D.3d 1482, 942 N.Y.S.2d 835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

94 A.D.3d 1482 (People v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pitts
828 N.E.2d 67 (New York Court of Appeals, 2005)
People v. Crawford
71 A.D.2d 38 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)