People v. Jones
92 A.D.3d 696, 937 N.Y.2d 862
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 7, 2012·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not move to withdraw the plea on that ground (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726 [1995]; People v Carr, 89 AD3d 1033 [2011]). In any event, the defendant’s plea of guilty was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently (see People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 16 [1983]; People v Jones, 183 AD2d 918 [1992]). Angiolillo, J.P, Dickerson, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Jones, 92 A.D.3d 696, 937 N.Y.2d 862 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
92 A.D.3d 696 (People v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Pelaez
100 A.D.3d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)