People v. Jones

13 A.D.3d 469, 785 N.Y.S.2d 705, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15227
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 293 A.D.2d 489

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau Court (O’Shaughnessy, J.), rendered April 11, 1980, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and grand larceny in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Samenga, J.), of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and his statement to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the hearing court erred in denying those branches of his omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and his confession is only partially preserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the recovery of a weapon and the defendant’s confession were not the fruit of an unlawful arrest (see People v Ketcham, 93 NY2d 416, 419 [1999]; People v Maldonado, 86 NY2d 631, 635-636 [1995]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are not preserved for appellate review or without merit. Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Smith and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jones, 13 A.D.3d 469, 785 N.Y.S.2d 705, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15227 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

13 A.D.3d 469 (People v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Maldonado
658 N.E.2d 1028 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Ketcham
712 N.E.2d 1238 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)