People v. Jones

286 A.D.2d 940, 731 N.Y.S.2d 418, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9125
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 255 A.D.2d 456

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of rape in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.25 [2]) and other crimes, defendant challenges the procedure used at sentencing to determine his risk assessment classification pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C). Contrary to the contention of defendant, he may not challenge that procedure upon appeal from a judgment of conviction entered prior to January 1, 2000 (see, People v Campbell, 279 AD2d 715, 715-716; see also, People v Kearns, 95 NY2d 816, 817-818). In any event, defendant failed to preserve that challenge for our review because he failed to raise it in County Court (see, People v Campbell, supra, at 716). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Rape, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Wisner, Burns and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jones, 286 A.D.2d 940, 731 N.Y.S.2d 418, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

286 A.D.2d 940 (People v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kearns
734 N.E.2d 743 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
People v. Campbell
279 A.D.2d 715 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)