People v. Jones

286 A.D.2d 646, 730 N.Y.S.2d 435, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8822
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 255 A.D.2d 456

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Leibovitz, J.), rendered March 4, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing her, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 8 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court’s Sandoval ruling, which permitted inquiry into whether defendant had previously been convicted of one felony and 20 misdemeanors between November 1992 and March 1998, while precluding inquiry into the nature and underlying facts of those convictions, and which permitted inquiry into defendant’s use of various aliases, birth dates and Social Security numbers, balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion (see, People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455, 459).

Defendant did not preserve her contention that the evidence supporting the element of physical injury was insufficient and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the jury could have reasonably inferred that the individual who was cut by defendant and who bled profusely suffered substantial pain (see, People v Guidice, 83 NY2d 630, 636). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jones, 286 A.D.2d 646, 730 N.Y.S.2d 435, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8822 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

286 A.D.2d 646 (People v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Walker
633 N.E.2d 472 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Guidice
634 N.E.2d 951 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)