People v. Jones

228 A.D.2d 619, 644 N.Y.2d 641, 644 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7070
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 196 A.D.2d 889

Opinion

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s sentence is not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

[620]*620The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jones, 228 A.D.2d 619, 644 N.Y.2d 641, 644 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7070 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

228 A.D.2d 619 (People v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)