People v. Jones

219 A.D.2d 736, 631 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9563
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 25, 1995·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), rendered June 9, 1993, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the trial court improperly commented on the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review as the defendant did not ask for a further curative instruction or renew his motion for a mistrial (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; see also, People v Geddes, 134 AD2d 279). In any event, the court’s [737]*737isolated statement was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence presented (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 241-242).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Copertino, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jones, 219 A.D.2d 736, 631 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9563 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

219 A.D.2d 736 (People v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

HICKS, RAYLAND L., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
People v. Hicks
94 A.D.3d 1483 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)