People v. Jones

211 A.D.2d 497, 621 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 339
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 182 A.D.2d 708

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), rendered April 22, 1992, convicting defendant, after jury trial, of three counts of robbery in the first degree and four counts of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 9 Vx to 19 years on each first degree robbery count and IVz to 15 years on each second degree robbery count, unanimously affirmed.

The record indicates that the trial court duly considered the probative worth of evidence of defendant’s three prior larceny convictions for impeachment purposes, as well as possible prejudice to defendant from introduction of such evidence (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371). The court’s ruling that, should defendant testify, he might properly be cross-examined only regarding a 1985 attempted grand larceny conviction, a 1986 petit larceny conviction, and a 1989 conviction for a felony involving the use or threat of force, without reference to the underlying facts, was not an improvident exercise of discretion (see, People v Bennette, 56 NY2d 142).

We note that the prosecutor adhered to the trial court’s Sandoval ruling in cross-examination, and was entitled to comment thereon in summation. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Kupferman, Asch and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jones, 211 A.D.2d 497, 621 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 339 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

211 A.D.2d 497 (People v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sandoval
314 N.E.2d 413 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
People v. Bennette
436 N.E.2d 1249 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)