People v. Jones

209 A.D.2d 640, 619 N.Y.S.2d 663
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 182 A.D.2d 708

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.), all rendered April 1, 1993, convicting him of robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 5722/92, attempted robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 7139/92, and robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 8125/92, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. The appeals bring up for review the denial, after hearings (Gold-stein, J., and Juviler, J.), of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motions which were to suppress identification testimony and statements made by him to law enforcement authorities.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jones, 209 A.D.2d 640, 619 N.Y.S.2d 663 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

209 A.D.2d 640 (People v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)