People v. Jones

149 A.D.2d 619, 540 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4953
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 A.D.2d 86

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Heller, J.), rendered November 3, 1984, convicting him of burglary in the first degree and robbery in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that the evidence was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

Nor can we say under the circumstances that the sentence imposed was excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jones, 149 A.D.2d 619, 540 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4953 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

149 A.D.2d 619 (People v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)