People v. Jones

261 N.E.2d 416, 27 N.Y.2d 616, 313 N.Y.S.2d 420, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1240
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 N.Y.2d 222
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 4, 1970·Published

Opinion

' Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein, there was presented and necessarily passed upon the following question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the rights of defendant under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments were denied. Defendant argued that trial counsel’s tactics were so patently lacking in competence that he was deprived of his fundamental constitutional rights to a fair trial and to due process of law. The Court of Appeals considered this contention and held that there was no violation of defendant’s constitutional rights. [See 27 N Y 2d 501.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Jones, 261 N.E.2d 416, 27 N.Y.2d 616, 313 N.Y.S.2d 420, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1240 (N.Y. 1970).

261 N.E.2d 416 (People v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.