People v. Jones

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Jones

189 N.E.2d 701, 12 N.Y.2d 1024

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 15 N.Y.2d 978 →

New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 28, 1963·Published

Opinion

Order reversed and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Bronx County, for a hearing upon the authority of People v. Sprague (11 N Y 2d 951). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster. Judge Scileppi concurs in result in the following memorandum: I concur on authority of People v. Boundy (10 N Y 2d 518) and People v. Sprague (11 N Y 2d 951). If the question were here as an original one, I would dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Judge Froessel in People v. Sprague (supra).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Bronx County, for a hearing upon the authority of People v. Sprague (11 N Y 2d 951). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster. Judge Scileppi concurs in result in the following memorandum: I concur on authority of People v. Boundy (10 N Y 2d 518) and People v. Sprague (11 N Y 2d 951). If the question were here as an original one, I would dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Judge Froessel in People v. Sprague (supra).

People v. Jones, 189 N.E.2d 701, 12 N.Y.2d 1024 (N.Y. 1963).

Pincite

189 N.E.2d 701 (People v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.