People v. Jones

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Jones

189 N.E.2d 701, 12 N.Y.2d 1024

DecidedMarch 28, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 189 N.E.2d 701 (People v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jones, 189 N.E.2d 701, 12 N.Y.2d 1024 (N.Y. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Bronx County, for a hearing upon the authority of People v. Sprague (11 N Y 2d 951). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster. Judge Scileppi concurs in result in the following memorandum: I concur on authority of People v. Boundy (10 N Y 2d 518) and People v. Sprague (11 N Y 2d 951). If the question were here as an original one, I would dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Judge Froessel in People v. Sprague (supra).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Bronx County, for a hearing upon the authority of People v. Sprague (11 N Y 2d 951). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster. Judge Scileppi concurs in result in the following memorandum: I concur on authority of People v. Boundy (10 N Y 2d 518) and People v. Sprague (11 N Y 2d 951). If the question were here as an original one, I would dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Judge Froessel in People v. Sprague (supra).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 N.E.2d 701, 12 N.Y.2d 1024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jones-ny-1963.