People v. Jonas

California Court of Appeal

People v. Jonas

271 P. 1113, 94 Cal. App. 799

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedNovember 15, 1928

DocketDocket No. 1687.

StatusPublished

This text of 271 P. 1113 (People v. Jonas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jonas, 271 P. 1113, 94 Cal. App. 799 (Cal. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

The information charged against defendant that he committed the crime of burglary, a felony, by entering certain described premises "with the intent then and there and therein to commit the crime of larceny." Judgment was entered against him, pursuant to a plea of guilty. He now claims that the information did not charge the commission of any crime.

[1] The only point in the case is identical with that presented to this court in People v. Giron, ante, p. 53 [270 P. 462]. In that case we held against the contention of appellant, and the supreme court has denied a petition for rehearing.

The judgment is affirmed.

Houser, J., and York, J., concurred.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI