People v. Johnson

97 A.D.3d 603, 947 N.Y.2d 341
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 64 A.D.3d 792

Opinion

[604]*604The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal, made at the time of his admission, precludes appellate review of his contentions that the sentence imposed was excessive and that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel, except to the extent that the alleged ineffective assistance affected the voluntariness of his admission (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1 [1989]; People v Watt, 82 AD3d 912 [2011]; People v Hughes, 62 AD3d 1026 [2009]; People v Vasser, 177 AD2d 729 [1991]). The defendant is not claiming that the alleged ineffective assistance of counsel rendered his admission to the violation of probation involuntary. Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Johnson, 97 A.D.3d 603, 947 N.Y.2d 341 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

97 A.D.3d 603 (People v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Hughes
62 A.D.3d 1026 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Watt
82 A.D.3d 912 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Vasser
177 A.D.2d 729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)