People v. Johnson

14 A.D.3d 434, 788 N.Y.S.2d 360, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 501
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 292 A.D.2d 871

Opinion

[435]*435Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard J. Fried, J.), rendered April 3, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of TVs years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly precluded defendant from establishing that, in response to a pedigree question during arrest processing, he stated that he was left-handed. This constituted hearsay, offered for its truth, and there was no applicable hearsay exception (see People v Reynoso, 73 NY2d 816, 819 [1988]). To the extent that defendant is raising a constitutional claim, such claim is unpreserved and without merit. While defendant claims that his alleged left-handedness was material to his defense, there was nothing to prevent him from offering competent evidence on that subject. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Marlow and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Johnson, 14 A.D.3d 434, 788 N.Y.S.2d 360, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 501 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

14 A.D.3d 434 (People v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Reynoso
73 N.Y.2d 816 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)