People v. Johnson

281 A.D.2d 992, 727 N.Y.S.2d 364, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2867
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 249 A.D.2d 417

Opinion

Motion for change of venue denied with leave to renew. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant has not met his burden of demonstrating that there is “reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had” in Niagara County (CPL 230.20 [2]). If it develops during voir dire that a fair and impartial jury cannot be drawn, an appropriate application may then be made. The relief requested in the application is premature (see, People v Mateo, 239 AD2d 965; see also, People v DiPiazza, 24 NY2d 342). Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ. (Filed Mar. 1, 2001.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Johnson, 281 A.D.2d 992, 727 N.Y.S.2d 364, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

281 A.D.2d 992 (People v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. DiPiazza
248 N.E.2d 412 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People v. Mateo
239 A.D.2d 965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)