People v. Johnson
228 A.D.2d 389, 644 N.Y.2d 623, 644 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7521
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 27, 1996·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
The hearing court did not unduly limit defense counsel’s cross-examination of the arresting officer concerning prior unrelated arrests. Inquiry on this issue was only marginally relevant, and the court properly exercised its discretion (see, Delaware v Van Arsdall, 475 US 673, 679). Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Johnson, 228 A.D.2d 389, 644 N.Y.2d 623, 644 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7521 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
228 A.D.2d 389 (People v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Vega
278 A.D.2d 39 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Andrews
237 A.D.2d 110 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Gomez
236 A.D.2d 268 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Rivera
234 A.D.2d 19 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)