People v. Johnson
225 A.D.2d 561, 639 N.Y.2d 723, 639 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1872
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 189 A.D.2d 318 →
Opinion
[562]*562The record indicates that the police interaction with the defendant was justified at its inception and reasonably limited in scope at each step in response to the circumstances presented (see, People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210; People v Chism, 194 AD2d 351; People v Martinez, 80 NY2d 444; People v Boodle, 47 NY2d 398, cert denied 444 US 969). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied suppression of the physical evidence. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Johnson, 225 A.D.2d 561, 639 N.Y.2d 723, 639 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 561 (People v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. De Bour
352 N.E.2d 562 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
People v. Boodle
391 N.E.2d 1329 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Martinez
606 N.E.2d 951 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Chism
194 A.D.2d 351 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)