People v. Johnson

222 A.D.2d 525, 635 N.Y.S.2d 60, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12756
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 188 A.D.2d 552

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Grajales, J.), rendered June 16, 1994, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

The People withheld Rosario material (see, People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286) consisting of a "buy operation subject cover sheet” (hereinafter cover sheet) prepared by the arresting officer. The cover sheet, inter alia, listed the numbers of property vouchers which were completed for property found on the defendant at the time of his arrest. However, the numbers of certain vouchers which were completed for property found on the defendant, were not listed on the cover sheet. At trial, the arresting officer testified regarding property found on the defendant. Hence, the cover sheet was related to the subject matter of the witness’s testimony. Since certain vouchers which were completed were not listed on the cover sheet, it cannot be considered a duplicative equivalent of the vouchers (see, People v Ranghelle, 69 NY2d 56), and thus the judgment must be reversed (see, People v Young, 79 NY2d 365).

In light of our determination we need not reach the defendant’s remaining contentions. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Rosenblatt and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Johnson, 222 A.D.2d 525, 635 N.Y.S.2d 60, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12756 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

222 A.D.2d 525 (People v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rosario
173 N.E.2d 881 (New York Court of Appeals, 1961)
People v. Ranghelle
503 N.E.2d 1011 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
People v. Young
591 N.E.2d 1163 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)