People v. Johnson

184 A.D.2d 1024, 586 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8256
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 154 A.D.2d 618

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we find that there is no basis to disturb the jury’s determination. The jury properly credited the testimony of the People’s witnesses over defendant’s testimony. We thus conclude that defendant’s conviction of two counts of assault in the first degree is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). We further find that County Court’s charge on reasonable doubt was not unbalanced and that "the jury, hearing the whole charge, would have gathered from its language the correct rule to have been applied in arriving at its verdict” (People v Canty, 60 NY2d 830, 832; see, People v Walker, 104 AD2d 573, 574).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J. — Assault, 1st Degree.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Johnson, 184 A.D.2d 1024, 586 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8256 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

184 A.D.2d 1024 (People v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Canty
457 N.E.2d 800 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Walker
104 A.D.2d 573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)