People v. Johnson

168 A.D.2d 278, 562 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15094
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 141 A.D.2d 848

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.), rendered on May 5, 1989, convicting defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of two counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and sentencing defendant to concurrent, indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 3 to 6 years, is unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly [279]*279harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” (People v Felman, 141 AD2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Johnson, 168 A.D.2d 278, 562 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15094 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

168 A.D.2d 278 (People v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Farrar
419 N.E.2d 864 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Felman
141 A.D.2d 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)