People v. Johnson

156 A.D.2d 1003, 550 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16207
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 129 A.D.2d 739

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We find that defendant did not knowingly waive his right to appeal at the time he entered his plea (see, People v Veaudry, 133 AD2d 524, Iv denied 70 NY2d 804; cf., People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 11). Nevertheless, there is no merit to defendant’s contentions. The court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea because defendant did not demonstrate his entitlement to such relief. The court also properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress the identification testimony because the photo array was not impermissibly suggestive. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J. — rape, first degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Johnson, 156 A.D.2d 1003, 550 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16207 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

156 A.D.2d 1003 (People v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Veaudry
133 A.D.2d 524 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)